Ann E. Dunwoody is a 4-star general. The first female 4-star general in the U.S armed forces. Historic.
Congratulations, General Dunwoody!
According to this story, “The military named its first female one-star in 1970, the first two-star in 1978 and the first three-star in 1996.”
11/15/2008
11/14/2008
Mail for the Dead
Around 11 years ago, my father died. 11 years ago. Around two years ago, my mother passed away. They did not live in Montana; they lived about 1500 miles away.
For some reason, every few weeks, I receive mail addressed to my mother or my father at my address. Even after writing on some return card or application that the person they were addressing their mail to was long-ago deceased, the mail continues today. I’ve even written “DEAD” on the cards and returned them. The offers continue.
I never filed a change of address to get my parents’ mail forwarded to me. My two sisters live in the area where my parents lived, and they were listed on most documents and handled all the arrangements after my parents died.
Yesterday, my father received a “Medicare Advantage Health Plan with Prescription Drug Coverage” from Humana, Inc., which is based out of Louisville, Kentucky. Mr. Patrick O’Toole, CSA, Vice President, writes to my dad that “It’s easy to enroll” and that he can “Get the facts” by calling them.
Well, Mr. O’Toole, if you can get my dad to enroll in your plan, then you are a better man than I. I would bet that my dad won’t be calling you, either.
My deceased mother received an offer for hearing aids the other day. I wrote on the card, “She doesn’t need a hearing aid because she is dead!!!” We’ll see if they send more offers.
I know some people would not make jokes about something like this. It might even bring up bad memories or create sadness in their lives and that’s too bad. In today’s world, some people might even file a lawsuit against those sending the mail.
These companies must purchase this information possibly from funeral homes or through state death records - maybe even our Federal Government sells the information to make a buck – you know to help pay the bills. Somebody is not getting a good deal.
Nevertheless, it’s really ridiculous to send mail to dead people. Come to think of it, if most of their offers are addressed to the dead, business may not be too good.
For some reason, every few weeks, I receive mail addressed to my mother or my father at my address. Even after writing on some return card or application that the person they were addressing their mail to was long-ago deceased, the mail continues today. I’ve even written “DEAD” on the cards and returned them. The offers continue.
I never filed a change of address to get my parents’ mail forwarded to me. My two sisters live in the area where my parents lived, and they were listed on most documents and handled all the arrangements after my parents died.
Yesterday, my father received a “Medicare Advantage Health Plan with Prescription Drug Coverage” from Humana, Inc., which is based out of Louisville, Kentucky. Mr. Patrick O’Toole, CSA, Vice President, writes to my dad that “It’s easy to enroll” and that he can “Get the facts” by calling them.
Well, Mr. O’Toole, if you can get my dad to enroll in your plan, then you are a better man than I. I would bet that my dad won’t be calling you, either.
My deceased mother received an offer for hearing aids the other day. I wrote on the card, “She doesn’t need a hearing aid because she is dead!!!” We’ll see if they send more offers.
I know some people would not make jokes about something like this. It might even bring up bad memories or create sadness in their lives and that’s too bad. In today’s world, some people might even file a lawsuit against those sending the mail.
These companies must purchase this information possibly from funeral homes or through state death records - maybe even our Federal Government sells the information to make a buck – you know to help pay the bills. Somebody is not getting a good deal.
Nevertheless, it’s really ridiculous to send mail to dead people. Come to think of it, if most of their offers are addressed to the dead, business may not be too good.
11/13/2008
Follow-up: “Failure” and “Deficiencies?”
In follow-up to my two recent posts called “Failure” and “Deficiencies?” the media in Montana finally picked up the story about the failure of a major inspection at Malmstrom AFB, Montana. The story had been percolating across the web for at least a couple of days.
Part of the problem with local reporting on stories like this is twofold: One reason is the media located around most military installations are mostly in awe of the military. Most reporters never served, so this is “golly-gee” to them. They get to ride in the jets, helicopters, and see “special” things and it somewhat corrupts their reporting. Second, and most important, is that most of the reporters have no idea the differences between a missile alert facility and a launch facility or an F-15 and an F-16. This is very apparent in Montana.
Readers may find it a little ironic that just a couple of months after the Secretary of the Air Force, Michael B. Donley, and the Air Force Chief of Staff, Norton A. Schwartz, visited Malmstrom AFB, the base failed a major inspection.
Donley and Schwartz came into their present positions when their predecessors were fired after several incidents that brought discredit upon the Air Force and the United States.
While failing a major inspection, like a Nuclear Surety Inspection (NSI), is an eye opener and “heads will roll” it is small in comparison to losing control of six nuclear-tipped missiles that were flown across the country or the accidental shipment to Taiwan components that arm and fuse nuclear warheads.
Inspections are conducted to ensure things like that don’t happen – to nip it in the bud so to speak. Unfortunately, military bases conduct several local inspections leading up to a big one, like the NSI, to correct problems before the inspection counts for real.
There are probably several reasons for these missteps from the Air Force in recent years.
First and foremost (to some people) is that our nation’s military is stressed due to two wars and increased threats both at home and abroad. Since 9/11 our military personnel are being asked to do more in their day to day operations and when they deployed to war zones. Many military personnel are either coming back from a deployment or facing a future deployment. Year after year of dealing with this tempo can bring down even the best people.
Another reason that may be overlooked in today’s military is arguably a leadership vacuum that happened way back in the early to mid 1990s.
In the early 1990s, the Department of Defense promoted a couple of programs called Special Separation Benefit and Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI/SSB) to reduce the military forces. The plan was to cut the forces by about 25% by 1997.
The forces were reduced significantly. Some reports showed around 77,000 military personnel took part in the VSI/SSB program. To be eligible, members must have completed more than 6 years of service as of December 1991.
Today, we may be seeing the results of this downsizing. Many of the thousands of people who took these programs would have been in the senior leadership of their branches of the military. Many would be the E-8s and E-9s in the enlisted ranks and the O-5s and O-6s in the officer ranks.
Nonetheless, a lesson must be learned that even when decisions are made next year by President Obama, these decisions just may harm the military for many many years down the road. I know that my friends on the left are right now thinking about Bush policies that may harm the military down the road (or already have) and that’s fair game, too.
No matter what the causes are of the recent failures in the Air Force, steps must be put in place to prevent future failures. Today is a new day. We can’t have any more failures because it gives those who want the military bases that house nuclear weapons, like Malmstrom, even more ammo to call for their closure. The world is still a very dangerous place.
Part of the problem with local reporting on stories like this is twofold: One reason is the media located around most military installations are mostly in awe of the military. Most reporters never served, so this is “golly-gee” to them. They get to ride in the jets, helicopters, and see “special” things and it somewhat corrupts their reporting. Second, and most important, is that most of the reporters have no idea the differences between a missile alert facility and a launch facility or an F-15 and an F-16. This is very apparent in Montana.
Readers may find it a little ironic that just a couple of months after the Secretary of the Air Force, Michael B. Donley, and the Air Force Chief of Staff, Norton A. Schwartz, visited Malmstrom AFB, the base failed a major inspection.
Donley and Schwartz came into their present positions when their predecessors were fired after several incidents that brought discredit upon the Air Force and the United States.
While failing a major inspection, like a Nuclear Surety Inspection (NSI), is an eye opener and “heads will roll” it is small in comparison to losing control of six nuclear-tipped missiles that were flown across the country or the accidental shipment to Taiwan components that arm and fuse nuclear warheads.
Inspections are conducted to ensure things like that don’t happen – to nip it in the bud so to speak. Unfortunately, military bases conduct several local inspections leading up to a big one, like the NSI, to correct problems before the inspection counts for real.
There are probably several reasons for these missteps from the Air Force in recent years.
First and foremost (to some people) is that our nation’s military is stressed due to two wars and increased threats both at home and abroad. Since 9/11 our military personnel are being asked to do more in their day to day operations and when they deployed to war zones. Many military personnel are either coming back from a deployment or facing a future deployment. Year after year of dealing with this tempo can bring down even the best people.
Another reason that may be overlooked in today’s military is arguably a leadership vacuum that happened way back in the early to mid 1990s.
In the early 1990s, the Department of Defense promoted a couple of programs called Special Separation Benefit and Voluntary Separation Incentive (VSI/SSB) to reduce the military forces. The plan was to cut the forces by about 25% by 1997.
The forces were reduced significantly. Some reports showed around 77,000 military personnel took part in the VSI/SSB program. To be eligible, members must have completed more than 6 years of service as of December 1991.
Today, we may be seeing the results of this downsizing. Many of the thousands of people who took these programs would have been in the senior leadership of their branches of the military. Many would be the E-8s and E-9s in the enlisted ranks and the O-5s and O-6s in the officer ranks.
Nonetheless, a lesson must be learned that even when decisions are made next year by President Obama, these decisions just may harm the military for many many years down the road. I know that my friends on the left are right now thinking about Bush policies that may harm the military down the road (or already have) and that’s fair game, too.
No matter what the causes are of the recent failures in the Air Force, steps must be put in place to prevent future failures. Today is a new day. We can’t have any more failures because it gives those who want the military bases that house nuclear weapons, like Malmstrom, even more ammo to call for their closure. The world is still a very dangerous place.
Details, details...
U.S. Senator Max Baucus, D-Mont., released his “vision” for health care reform yesterday to much fanfare. Baucus calls his plan, “Call to Action, Health Reform 2009.” You can view his plan HERE.
One “minor” detail was left out. The Associated Press reports: Baucus did not offer a way to pay for his proposal, which included such costly provisions as allowing people ages 55-64 to participate in Medicare and eliminating the requirement that disabled people wait two years from when they become disabled to enroll in Medicare.
I agree the two year wait after someone becomes disabled to enroll in Medicare is a silly bureaucratic rule, not to mention a rule that should have been changed years ago by none other than Senator Max Baucus. He’s been there for 30 years.
But the major issue Congress will have to tackle is how to pay for Max’s reform. It will be expensive. Very expensive. Maybe the powerful Democrats feel that if we run out of money, they’ll just make more. That is the detail that Baucus missed, but it is the one that people will want to see before they buy off on this plan.
So, after 30-some years in the U.S. Senate, Max Baucus has finally presented a Health Reform plan – with no price tag.
One “minor” detail was left out. The Associated Press reports: Baucus did not offer a way to pay for his proposal, which included such costly provisions as allowing people ages 55-64 to participate in Medicare and eliminating the requirement that disabled people wait two years from when they become disabled to enroll in Medicare.
I agree the two year wait after someone becomes disabled to enroll in Medicare is a silly bureaucratic rule, not to mention a rule that should have been changed years ago by none other than Senator Max Baucus. He’s been there for 30 years.
But the major issue Congress will have to tackle is how to pay for Max’s reform. It will be expensive. Very expensive. Maybe the powerful Democrats feel that if we run out of money, they’ll just make more. That is the detail that Baucus missed, but it is the one that people will want to see before they buy off on this plan.
So, after 30-some years in the U.S. Senate, Max Baucus has finally presented a Health Reform plan – with no price tag.
11/12/2008
Paulson Press Conference: Yawn
The biggest question most people have right now is where does the government plan to stop on this bailout circus? Of course, most folks probably want the government to stop bailing out companies right after their company is bailed out.
I’d like a personal bailout. I have a mortgage and some other debt. It would be great if old Hank Paulson would just swoop in and clear out my debt. I promise to pay you back, Hank. You won’t see me at a spa and resort living it up, either. I will hide out for a few months until the anger subsides from those who did not get a bailout. Psst, I won’t brag to my neighbors about being bailed out, either. Maybe I should start a PayPal account for donations?
Frankly, I don’t understand most of what is happening, and I think a lot of people are like that. We understand that some bad things (like mismanagement) happened to some companies and the Government has stepped in to bail them out. Most of us believe the mess was created by the government not watching these companies closely, and it is not solely a mess created by the Republicans or the Democrats. Both are to blame. Of course, we’ve read or watched on TV as some of these companies held retreats and some CEOs received nice packages after being fired or retired.
Now, Congress is planning on heading back into session to spread some more of our money around like throwing a life preserver to the folks on the Titanic. I was against the $700 billion bailout. I will be against other efforts. Max Baucus is getting ready to unveil the mother of all healthcare proposals, which means even more money will be spent and the red ink will continue to pile up.
Most of us believe in responsibility. I think most of us come from the angle of let the chips fall where they may. No more bailouts, period. Most of our parents and grandparents would be shocked at the path this country has taken. My parents had one credit card their whole lives and that was only used to make reservations when they traveled, infrequently. Then they paid the hotel bill in cash.
Finally, you have to laugh at this whole mess. I caught myself yawning several times as Hank Paulson spoke about the financial mess: Bueller?... Bueller?... Bueller? When he stopped to swig some water from a bottle, my first thought was that this would make a good sketch on Saturday Night Live. Instead of drinking water, Hank could be swigging from a bottle of Jack Daniels as we watch an insert on the screen of the Dow Jones Industrials falling like rock while Hank is getting drunk. Then we’d see Hank looking at the numbers falling and trying to say things to make them go back up.
I see humor in most things, but it is getting tougher during this disaster.
I’d like a personal bailout. I have a mortgage and some other debt. It would be great if old Hank Paulson would just swoop in and clear out my debt. I promise to pay you back, Hank. You won’t see me at a spa and resort living it up, either. I will hide out for a few months until the anger subsides from those who did not get a bailout. Psst, I won’t brag to my neighbors about being bailed out, either. Maybe I should start a PayPal account for donations?
Frankly, I don’t understand most of what is happening, and I think a lot of people are like that. We understand that some bad things (like mismanagement) happened to some companies and the Government has stepped in to bail them out. Most of us believe the mess was created by the government not watching these companies closely, and it is not solely a mess created by the Republicans or the Democrats. Both are to blame. Of course, we’ve read or watched on TV as some of these companies held retreats and some CEOs received nice packages after being fired or retired.
Now, Congress is planning on heading back into session to spread some more of our money around like throwing a life preserver to the folks on the Titanic. I was against the $700 billion bailout. I will be against other efforts. Max Baucus is getting ready to unveil the mother of all healthcare proposals, which means even more money will be spent and the red ink will continue to pile up.
Most of us believe in responsibility. I think most of us come from the angle of let the chips fall where they may. No more bailouts, period. Most of our parents and grandparents would be shocked at the path this country has taken. My parents had one credit card their whole lives and that was only used to make reservations when they traveled, infrequently. Then they paid the hotel bill in cash.
Finally, you have to laugh at this whole mess. I caught myself yawning several times as Hank Paulson spoke about the financial mess: Bueller?... Bueller?... Bueller? When he stopped to swig some water from a bottle, my first thought was that this would make a good sketch on Saturday Night Live. Instead of drinking water, Hank could be swigging from a bottle of Jack Daniels as we watch an insert on the screen of the Dow Jones Industrials falling like rock while Hank is getting drunk. Then we’d see Hank looking at the numbers falling and trying to say things to make them go back up.
I see humor in most things, but it is getting tougher during this disaster.
Failure
In an update to a recent post called, “Deficiencies” the Military Times is now reporting that Malmstrom AFB failed its Nuclear Surety Inspection (NSI).
In the article called “Malmstrom missile wing fails nuke inspection” it was reported that “inspectors found problems with the wing’s weapons storage area and its personnel reliability program, which monitors who can work with nuclear weapons.”
Ouch.
The inspectors will return in 90 days to re-inspect. As someone who spent some time in the Air Force, I can tell you these 90 days will be tough. Plus, the 90 days is through the holidays and may mean a few less holiday cocktail parties for the senior leadership at the base. Tough times indeed.
The Air Force has been having some serious problems over the last few years. This is another negative mark. Luckily for the current leadership at the base, the Military Times reports that nobody will be fired, although from my experience it’s probably a career ender for some.
In the article called “Malmstrom missile wing fails nuke inspection” it was reported that “inspectors found problems with the wing’s weapons storage area and its personnel reliability program, which monitors who can work with nuclear weapons.”
Ouch.
The inspectors will return in 90 days to re-inspect. As someone who spent some time in the Air Force, I can tell you these 90 days will be tough. Plus, the 90 days is through the holidays and may mean a few less holiday cocktail parties for the senior leadership at the base. Tough times indeed.
The Air Force has been having some serious problems over the last few years. This is another negative mark. Luckily for the current leadership at the base, the Military Times reports that nobody will be fired, although from my experience it’s probably a career ender for some.
11/11/2008
Jockeying Update
In an update to my previous post entitled “Jockeying” Lee Enterprises has published a story today about the folks who want one of the coveted jobs here in Montana with the Obama Administration.
I’m glad I could help start the conservation and offer some guidance.
For the U.S. Attorney position, there are several people listed but one stands out and that is Baucus’ State Director, Melodee Hanes. In my opinion, Ms. Hanes has to have the insight track to the job, considering she has been a loyal staffer to Senator Baucus for a number of years. It appears she has experience, too, which is not always the case when these people are chosen.
Yesterday, the Billings Gazette editorial board endorsed current U.S. Marshal, Dwight MacKay, to keep his position under the new administration. While MacKay is heads and tails above anyone the Obama administration could select, I feel the chances of him keeping the job is slim. Lee Newspapers lists a couple of people interested in the U.S. Marshal’s job. One person they did not list is and one that I have seen a rumor about is Billings Mayor Ron Tussing, who was also the former police Billings Police Chief.
So far, I have not heard of other rumors about state directors for USDA-Rural Development and for Farm Service Agency (FSA) or the FSA board.
By the way, you can get “Inaugration Tickets Information” from Baucus’ website (even if they can’t spell “Inauguration” correctly). I know, I know, it’s been many years since they had to do this…
I’m glad I could help start the conservation and offer some guidance.
For the U.S. Attorney position, there are several people listed but one stands out and that is Baucus’ State Director, Melodee Hanes. In my opinion, Ms. Hanes has to have the insight track to the job, considering she has been a loyal staffer to Senator Baucus for a number of years. It appears she has experience, too, which is not always the case when these people are chosen.
Yesterday, the Billings Gazette editorial board endorsed current U.S. Marshal, Dwight MacKay, to keep his position under the new administration. While MacKay is heads and tails above anyone the Obama administration could select, I feel the chances of him keeping the job is slim. Lee Newspapers lists a couple of people interested in the U.S. Marshal’s job. One person they did not list is and one that I have seen a rumor about is Billings Mayor Ron Tussing, who was also the former police Billings Police Chief.
So far, I have not heard of other rumors about state directors for USDA-Rural Development and for Farm Service Agency (FSA) or the FSA board.
By the way, you can get “Inaugration Tickets Information” from Baucus’ website (even if they can’t spell “Inauguration” correctly). I know, I know, it’s been many years since they had to do this…
Veterans Day 2008
Happy Veterans Day to all my fellow veterans!
“The nation which forgets its defenders will be itself forgotten.” -Calvin Coolidge, 30th President of the United States
Many have gone before us, and many more will follow. We are military veterans. We served our country during wartime and during peacetime.
Some died doing their duty to protect and defend this country. Some suffered physical injuries, and others suffered mental injuries.
When we see the flag of the United States of America coming down the road during the parade, we salute it as it comes by. Maybe our salutes are not as sharp as they used to be, but the love of our country is as sharp as ever.
Many of us have seen the flag being raised in locations around the world as a sign of victory, a victory that was bought with our blood. When we visited a foreign country during our service, we were happy to come home to the flag of the United States of America.
Some of us did not become veterans because we were drafted to serve during a war. Many of us became veterans because we volunteered to serve our country.
We all joined the military by signing our names on the dotted line knowing in our minds that we could be sent anywhere in the world. We signed our names knowing that we could be killed or injured protecting our country. Many of us signed up to serve our country knowing that many of our friends and family thought less of us for joining.
We all knew that the United States military would change us, be it for the better or for the worse.
We signed our names on the line so that you might have your freedom and your liberty.
We’ve seen our flag draped over a coffin of a friend, and with tears in our eyes, we saluted. We’ve watched a young wife receive the flag that was draped over her husband’s casket while her two young children cling to her. We’ve heard Taps played too many times while we’ve watched parents of a brave young military person bury their young son or daughter.
We’ve flinched as the volleys are fired into the sky at our fellow veteran’s funeral.
We’ve trembled with anger when we’ve seen someone burn our flag in protest, drag it on the ground, spit or defecate on it. But, we’ve proudly smiled when we’ve see young children face the flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance with their hands over their hearts.
We’ve been to the graves of the true heroes buried at Arlington, and we’ve touched the names of the heroes carved in granite on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial.
We stand in awe of those who have gone before us. We will always salute you.
We’ve cheered when disabled veterans get their benefits from our government, and we’ve cursed when they could not. We’ve shaken our heads in disbelief when qualified veterans did not get a federal job.
We hold a place in our hearts for the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month.
This Veterans Day, take a moment to thank a veteran for his/her service. Thank the veteran for your freedoms and liberties. Thank the veteran for keeping you safe.
It will make you and the veteran feel better.
11/10/2008
Deficiencies?
The website, “Wired” is reporting that Malmstrom AFB had some deficiencies in several areas during a recent Nuclear Surety Inspection (NSI) and Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI) and that a return inspection is needed.
According to the STORY: AFSPC [Air Force Space Command] is ensuring experienced instructors augment the wing's aggressive plan to address the root causes of these deficiencies. The AFSPC IG [Inspector General] will return to inspect appropriate aspects of the 341st Missile Wing within 90 days in accordance with established Department of Defense and Air Force guidance.
This is not good news if it’s true. The Air Force has been having some problems recently and did not need more negative publicity.
According to this STORY from Malmstrom’s Public Affairs Office, the base was having a NSI/ORI inspection recently.
According to the STORY: AFSPC [Air Force Space Command] is ensuring experienced instructors augment the wing's aggressive plan to address the root causes of these deficiencies. The AFSPC IG [Inspector General] will return to inspect appropriate aspects of the 341st Missile Wing within 90 days in accordance with established Department of Defense and Air Force guidance.
This is not good news if it’s true. The Air Force has been having some problems recently and did not need more negative publicity.
According to this STORY from Malmstrom’s Public Affairs Office, the base was having a NSI/ORI inspection recently.
Anticipation
November, December and January will be the months of anticipation. To some folks, the anticipation will revolve around sports (football playoffs and bowl games), while others might be anticipating the Christmas season and if that new flat screen TV will be under the tree.
But the mother of all anticipation surrounds President-elect Barack Obama.
In November, December and January after the 2006 election we saw a sense of anticipation from the citizens of the United States after they had placed the Democrats in charge of the U.S. House and Senate. The Democrats, to win seats, had promised to end the war in Iraq, stop the runaway earmarking process, and give our country a real energy policy. None of that happened, but the Democrats had another card to play for the 2008 elections and that was “give us the White House and you’ll really see changes.”
So now they have control - lock, stock and barrel. The Democrats have another card to play in the next election (2010) and that would be to tell the American people to give them 60 seats in the Senate so they really install their plans and ideas (also so they can ram their bills through without any opposition). Of course, in 2012 they will tell America they aren’t done yet because it took the Republicans eight years to screw it up and they need eight years to repair it. “Don’t bring back the Bush years” will be their campaign slogan.
Who knows what will happen by the end of Obama’s first term. Will the voters be swayed with these campaign themes, or will they want a more balanced Congress and White House?
Nobody figured in the first year of the Bush Administration there would be an attack on our country. After historic high approval ratings after his first year in office, nobody would have thought his approval ratings would tank near the end of his second term. Not even the most seasoned campaign consultant will be able to predict what the future holds.
We can never know about the days to come...But we think about them anyway, yay.
And I wonder if I'm really with you now...Or just chasin' after some finer day. Anticipation, anticipation
But the mother of all anticipation surrounds President-elect Barack Obama.
In November, December and January after the 2006 election we saw a sense of anticipation from the citizens of the United States after they had placed the Democrats in charge of the U.S. House and Senate. The Democrats, to win seats, had promised to end the war in Iraq, stop the runaway earmarking process, and give our country a real energy policy. None of that happened, but the Democrats had another card to play for the 2008 elections and that was “give us the White House and you’ll really see changes.”
So now they have control - lock, stock and barrel. The Democrats have another card to play in the next election (2010) and that would be to tell the American people to give them 60 seats in the Senate so they really install their plans and ideas (also so they can ram their bills through without any opposition). Of course, in 2012 they will tell America they aren’t done yet because it took the Republicans eight years to screw it up and they need eight years to repair it. “Don’t bring back the Bush years” will be their campaign slogan.
Who knows what will happen by the end of Obama’s first term. Will the voters be swayed with these campaign themes, or will they want a more balanced Congress and White House?
Nobody figured in the first year of the Bush Administration there would be an attack on our country. After historic high approval ratings after his first year in office, nobody would have thought his approval ratings would tank near the end of his second term. Not even the most seasoned campaign consultant will be able to predict what the future holds.
We can never know about the days to come...But we think about them anyway, yay.
And I wonder if I'm really with you now...Or just chasin' after some finer day. Anticipation, anticipation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)